<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 40D rumoured</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:10:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lin and Jirsa</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-474517</link>
		<dc:creator>Lin and Jirsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-474517</guid>
		<description>Just stumbled upon this article today.  Isn&#039;t it crazy to fast forward into the future and see how far we&#039;ve come with the 50D and the Mark II?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just stumbled upon this article today.  Isn&#8217;t it crazy to fast forward into the future and see how far we&#8217;ve come with the 50D and the Mark II?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssss</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-244200</link>
		<dc:creator>ssss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-244200</guid>
		<description>tanjatiziana

As a 30D buyer of a couple months, I’d be so insulted, but is to be expected from them.
__________________________________________________________________

Piece of electronic is stil piece of electronic.I do not judge them for making a better product and making it availibe to us consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tanjatiziana</p>
<p>As a 30D buyer of a couple months, I’d be so insulted, but is to be expected from them.<br />
__________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Piece of electronic is stil piece of electronic.I do not judge them for making a better product and making it availibe to us consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-201904</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 06:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-201904</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m waiting for the 6D full frame dslr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for the 6D full frame dslr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-196566</link>
		<dc:creator>thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-196566</guid>
		<description>Nobody is going to buy a 40D if they already have a 30D. Canon is silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody is going to buy a 40D if they already have a 30D. Canon is silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-177091</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 23:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-177091</guid>
		<description>40D bores me to tears, the anti-dust thing doesnt work on the xti, probably won&#039;t work here either. I&#039;m far more interested if the 5D being split into 2 camera models rumour is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40D bores me to tears, the anti-dust thing doesnt work on the xti, probably won&#8217;t work here either. I&#8217;m far more interested if the 5D being split into 2 camera models rumour is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4wallz</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-173968</link>
		<dc:creator>4wallz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-173968</guid>
		<description>The biggest thing would be the new Digic III processor and better high ISO performance and perhaps expanded ISO to 6400 like the new 1D MK III.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest thing would be the new Digic III processor and better high ISO performance and perhaps expanded ISO to 6400 like the new 1D MK III.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fotograf.416</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-132828</link>
		<dc:creator>Fotograf.416</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-132828</guid>
		<description>#1 google link for &quot;canon 40d&quot;!

it&#039;s not surprising that new models keep coming along so quickly as they appear to be mostly tweaks on the 20d...  20d mark III anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 google link for &#8220;canon 40d&#8221;!</p>
<p>it&#8217;s not surprising that new models keep coming along so quickly as they appear to be mostly tweaks on the 20d&#8230;  20d mark III anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gavinholt</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-47860</link>
		<dc:creator>gavinholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 13:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-47860</guid>
		<description>ummmm, I&#039;m guessing they are going to postpone the 40d until feb at the next big show, plus it&#039;s after the rebates are done.  bummer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummmm, I&#8217;m guessing they are going to postpone the 40d until feb at the next big show, plus it&#8217;s after the rebates are done.  bummer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon 40D &#171; the apple of my i</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-47755</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon 40D &#171; the apple of my i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-47755</guid>
		<description>[...] Photojunkie [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photojunkie [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gavinholt</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-47744</link>
		<dc:creator>gavinholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-47744</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but I&#039;ve had it where dust entering the body in the middle of the day due to many lens changes (like during a wedding) has made half of my images have a dust spot.  And the step up from my 10d (I&#039;ve been patient) means better blowups to 8x10.  Now I just need to replace my 1d 4.5 Mp...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but I&#8217;ve had it where dust entering the body in the middle of the day due to many lens changes (like during a wedding) has made half of my images have a dust spot.  And the step up from my 10d (I&#8217;ve been patient) means better blowups to 8&#215;10.  Now I just need to replace my 1d 4.5 Mp&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.353 seconds -->
