<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 40D rumoured</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:28:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lin and Jirsa</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-474517</link>
		<dc:creator>Lin and Jirsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-474517</guid>
		<description>Just stumbled upon this article today.  Isn&#039;t it crazy to fast forward into the future and see how far we&#039;ve come with the 50D and the Mark II?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just stumbled upon this article today.  Isn&#8217;t it crazy to fast forward into the future and see how far we&#8217;ve come with the 50D and the Mark II?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssss</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-244200</link>
		<dc:creator>ssss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-244200</guid>
		<description>tanjatiziana

As a 30D buyer of a couple months, I’d be so insulted, but is to be expected from them.
__________________________________________________________________

Piece of electronic is stil piece of electronic.I do not judge them for making a better product and making it availibe to us consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tanjatiziana</p>
<p>As a 30D buyer of a couple months, I’d be so insulted, but is to be expected from them.<br />
__________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Piece of electronic is stil piece of electronic.I do not judge them for making a better product and making it availibe to us consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-201904</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 06:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-201904</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m waiting for the 6D full frame dslr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for the 6D full frame dslr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-196566</link>
		<dc:creator>thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-196566</guid>
		<description>Nobody is going to buy a 40D if they already have a 30D. Canon is silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody is going to buy a 40D if they already have a 30D. Canon is silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-177091</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 23:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-177091</guid>
		<description>40D bores me to tears, the anti-dust thing doesnt work on the xti, probably won&#039;t work here either. I&#039;m far more interested if the 5D being split into 2 camera models rumour is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40D bores me to tears, the anti-dust thing doesnt work on the xti, probably won&#8217;t work here either. I&#8217;m far more interested if the 5D being split into 2 camera models rumour is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4wallz</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-173968</link>
		<dc:creator>4wallz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-173968</guid>
		<description>The biggest thing would be the new Digic III processor and better high ISO performance and perhaps expanded ISO to 6400 like the new 1D MK III.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest thing would be the new Digic III processor and better high ISO performance and perhaps expanded ISO to 6400 like the new 1D MK III.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fotograf.416</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-132828</link>
		<dc:creator>Fotograf.416</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-132828</guid>
		<description>#1 google link for &quot;canon 40d&quot;!

it&#039;s not surprising that new models keep coming along so quickly as they appear to be mostly tweaks on the 20d...  20d mark III anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 google link for &#8220;canon 40d&#8221;!</p>
<p>it&#8217;s not surprising that new models keep coming along so quickly as they appear to be mostly tweaks on the 20d&#8230;  20d mark III anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gavinholt</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-47860</link>
		<dc:creator>gavinholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 13:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-47860</guid>
		<description>ummmm, I&#039;m guessing they are going to postpone the 40d until feb at the next big show, plus it&#039;s after the rebates are done.  bummer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummmm, I&#8217;m guessing they are going to postpone the 40d until feb at the next big show, plus it&#8217;s after the rebates are done.  bummer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon 40D &#171; the apple of my i</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-47755</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon 40D &#171; the apple of my i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-47755</guid>
		<description>[...] Photojunkie [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photojunkie [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gavinholt</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-47744</link>
		<dc:creator>gavinholt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-47744</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but I&#039;ve had it where dust entering the body in the middle of the day due to many lens changes (like during a wedding) has made half of my images have a dust spot.  And the step up from my 10d (I&#039;ve been patient) means better blowups to 8x10.  Now I just need to replace my 1d 4.5 Mp...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but I&#8217;ve had it where dust entering the body in the middle of the day due to many lens changes (like during a wedding) has made half of my images have a dust spot.  And the step up from my 10d (I&#8217;ve been patient) means better blowups to 8&#215;10.  Now I just need to replace my 1d 4.5 Mp&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threeflavours</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-47706</link>
		<dc:creator>threeflavours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 05:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-47706</guid>
		<description>Meh.. Even if it is true, what is the attraction? 2 Mp and anti-dust.. I have cleaned my 20D and 30D sensors with a mix of windex and alcohol since I have owned them.. With Q tips at that.. Don&#039;t believe the rumours that the filters can be scratched by looking at them, they are a lot tougher than Canon would lead you to believe..  As a self-professed gearaddict, I wouldn&#039;t step up to the plate.. (even if it were true)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh.. Even if it is true, what is the attraction? 2 Mp and anti-dust.. I have cleaned my 20D and 30D sensors with a mix of windex and alcohol since I have owned them.. With Q tips at that.. Don&#8217;t believe the rumours that the filters can be scratched by looking at them, they are a lot tougher than Canon would lead you to believe..  As a self-professed gearaddict, I wouldn&#8217;t step up to the plate.. (even if it were true)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photojunkie</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-47700</link>
		<dc:creator>photojunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 19:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-47700</guid>
		<description>It seems that the cycles are getting shorter and shorter  between various models of dSLRs. The 10D was on the market for quite sometime before the 20D was released. There was at least a year gap between the 20D and 30D. But gap is getting smaller and smaller. 

I&#039;m still holding out for an affordable full frame, or at least one with the EOS Integrated Cleaning System.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the cycles are getting shorter and shorter  between various models of dSLRs. The 10D was on the market for quite sometime before the 20D was released. There was at least a year gap between the 20D and 30D. But gap is getting smaller and smaller. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still holding out for an affordable full frame, or at least one with the EOS Integrated Cleaning System.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanjatiziana</title>
		<link>http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/comment-page-1/#comment-47699</link>
		<dc:creator>tanjatiziana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 17:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photojunkie.ca/archive/2006/09/canon-40d-rumoured/#comment-47699</guid>
		<description>As a 30D buyer of a couple months, I&#039;d be so insulted, but is to be expected from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a 30D buyer of a couple months, I&#8217;d be so insulted, but is to be expected from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.370 seconds -->

